Today I’m interviewing J. Steve Miller concerning his recent book: Richard Dawkins and His God Delusion: A preliminary critique of his truth claims. In an objective (not inflammatory) manner, Miller responds to the best-selling assault on Christianity, The God Delusion. Miller is intimately acquainted with the issues he addresses, having studied religion and philosophy at [...]
Read the rest of this entry »Getting the Most out of Critiques
Critiques with purpose Peer critiques are a valuable tool in polishing up your writing, but it has to be done correctly to be effective. Writing is a lonely business, but publishing is a social world. You cannot go at it alone. Even the best writer can’t critique his/her way to perfection. You may know what [...]
Read the rest of this entry »Polishing your gems – 5 editing strategies (Part 3 of 3)
Using discernment in critique groups Critiques are often filled with both good and bad advice. For a writer, this can be confusing. Fellow writers sometimes attempt to impose their voice onto your work. Critiquing is not intended to cause writers to adopt a specific style of writing, but to identify problems that keep their voice [...]
Read the rest of this entry »Polishing your gems – 5 editing strategies (Part 2 of 3)
3. Helpful Tools There are a few helpful tools that assist writers in catching a large portion of mistakes. These tools will help you catch many errors, but the work is far from complete from our self-editing. Keep in mind, this is course grit polishing. These help smooth out the rough edges and find obvious [...]
Read the rest of this entry »Polishing your gems – 5 editing strategies (Part 1 of 3)
Once you finish writing your manuscript, the work of self-editing begins. Self-editing is the process of catching the obvious mistakes so you don’t waste critiquing time with the little stuff. A critique partner or an editor should only see your work after it’s polished as far as you can take it. With very few exceptions, [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
